Free tool
Meta Tag Analyzer
Read the title, description, canonical, robots, and social tags a public page returns.
The check could not be completed
Meta tag results
Findings
Each finding says what was observed and what it means. There is no overall score: any single number would hide the weighting behind it.
What the page returned
| Field | Value |
|---|
Heading outline
What This Tool Does
The meta tag analyzer fetches a public page and reports the metadata it actually returns: the title, the meta description, the canonical URL, robots directives, Open Graph and X (Twitter) fields, the heading outline, and how many images are missing alt text.
It is useful when a plugin, a theme, or a caching layer is producing different tags from the ones you expect.
How to Use It
Enter a public page URL and run the check. Fields are grouped so you can see what is present, what is missing, and what appears more than once.
How the Tool Calculates or Retrieves Data
The page is requested from this website's server and the returned HTML is parsed. Only the HTML the server sends is examined, and each finding is a direct reading of a tag rather than an interpretation.
The tool does not produce an overall score. A single number would hide which finding matters, and the weighting behind it would be arbitrary, so each observation is listed with its own explanation instead.
Understanding Your Results
Work through the findings in order of consequence.
- A missing or duplicated title is the most significant problem, because it is the strongest on-page signal and the main clickable line in a result.
- A missing description is not an error, but it does hand snippet writing entirely to the search engine.
- A canonical pointing at a different URL tells search engines to index that one instead — make sure it is deliberate.
- A noindex directive removes the page from search results, which is occasionally intended and often not.
- Several H1 elements are valid HTML but usually indicate an unclear page structure.
Frequently Asked Questions
Any single score depends on weightings chosen by whoever built it, and those weightings are rarely published. Listing each finding with its consequence is more honest and more useful.
That usually means the tags are added by JavaScript in the browser. Search engines can render JavaScript, but tags present in the server response are more reliable.